Imagine you are seeing someone in an orchestra playing a piano. Now, replace the piano with capitalism. The idea is incoherent. This has nothing to do with you, the orchestra, or capitalism, it has to do with the fact that this post was not made to make any sort of point.

Then if this post has no point, why does it exist? Well, you have to remember to put things in context. This post does not exist in a vacuum; it has to be written by someone.

This someone may have multiple reasons for writing this post, or may not themselves even know their motivation for writing it. However, to say the latter in this case would be a lie, since the primary reason is as a time waster during a break at school. See that? That’s additional context. Not only is the writer of a pointless post important for explaining its existence, but their circumstances as well.

Although, there may be other reasons aside from the primary reason. There are many other time wasters apart from beginning a post with a fake analogy about capitalism using orchestras. Intention is also important here; they may intend to follow up the analogy with extra sentences vaguely resembling criticisms but aren’t due to their lack of meaning, even if they end up analyzing their own decisions in its place.

The writer also just may like incoherence for the sake of incoherence, as seen by some of their past vague ramblings on outdaded (however recently updated) forums, and I don’t know how to end this properly.