@88 | wasteof.money 4

1C: +200

2D: +180

3D: +120

2num: +100

2L: +75

3num: +75

3L: +40

3C: +20

XX: +70

XXX: +70

(etc)

XYYY: ?

XXYY: ?

XXXY: ?

XYYX: ?

XYYZ: ?

XXYZ: ?

XYZZ: ?

XYXY: ?

XYXZ: ?

XYX: ?

XXY: ?

XYY: ?

XX: ?

X: ?

4num: ?

4L: ?

4C: ?

5num: ?

6num: ?

there are even more to sort. This is a massive project..

Jan 20, 2024, 10:37 PM

2 0 15

comments

@yay Jan 25, 2024, 10:44 PM

I have a similar idea:

21-[length]

4-[types of characters]

39-[unique characters]

For example,

Btdim1 has a length of 6. 21-6=15, so +15 points.

Btdim1 has 2 types of characters (letters, numbers). 4-2=2, so +2 points.

Btdim1 has 6 unique characters. 39-6=33, so +33 points.

15+2+33=50, so Btdim1 has a SARS value of 50.

@yay Jan 25, 2024, 10:47 PM

A 1char would have the SARS value of 61.

@88 Jan 26, 2024, 9:54 AM

thing is, that idea, while good for measuring long usernames, breaks down a little when reaching 1chars. a 1char would only be 11 points more valuable than btdim1 if I understand correctly.

@yay Jan 26, 2024, 9:18 PM

The length points could be multiplied by 2.

@88 Jan 26, 2024, 10:25 PM

So the shorter it gets the more exponentially high the value gets?

@yay Jan 27, 2024, 12:21 AM

Yes.

See more replies

@tris Jan 21, 2024, 12:01 AM

What are you doing?

@tris Jan 21, 2024, 12:02 AM

Better question: why

@asdf Jan 21, 2024, 9:53 AM

long story

@up Jan 21, 2024, 3:17 AM

I think that it is the Scratch Account Rarity Scale (SARS).