I get the sentiment here. TikTok is in a lot of ways dubious. The links to the Chinese government are very scary (even if TikTok was resisting China, it cannot ignore laws that allow the government to access basically all user data), privacy isn’t great either, and poor moderation. However, something not being made clear enough is that the bill currently making its way through the US government titled “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act” isn’t just targeting TikTok, that’s what it is being used for right now, but it allows the president to declare any "foreign adversary-controlled applications" that are deemed as a significant national security threat to the US. This feels quite a bit like a slippery slope, sure, banning TikTok might be reasonable, but what if in the future the US decides to ban another social media in the name of national security when it’s more about ideology per se. There’s also the issue of whether you’re okay with ALL future presidents having this power. I’m not defending TikTok, but come on, banning something won’t actually stop TikTok, VPN’s exist. What would actually have not perfect, but some real effect is if the US would adopt strong privacy and data laws like the EU’s GDPR - this would rein in TikTok, and all tech companies, because let’s be real, they’re all evil and vying to sell our data, Meta has been accused of election interference y’know. The current solution IMO leads to some real issues in the future.

TikTok is being banned in the US.

Start celebrating, this might take a bit of a hit on their platform - I get some people just wanna use it, but you cannot deny it’s also a partial cause of a lot of brainrot.

The issue is that apparently TikTok is granting people in the US a huge “Please vote to not ban us” thing. I mean, they even pull bullshit:

"Destroy the livelihoods of countless creators across the country"

Lmao no it won’t, you pay like $20-50 (or $0.04 - Unable to find a source but those are the most common ratios I’ve seen) per 1 million views; Practically lower than my will to live, atleast higher than minimum wage I guess? Meh, I digress. So they are also lying in their own vote to not be banned! How trustworthy!

Plus they (the creators) can just switch platforms and announce that they are moving, sure, they may lose a lot of their fanbase, but atleast they’re moving away from that garbage.

Mar 7, 2024, 9:28 PM
6 1 9

comments

I will be honest - I did not really see the bill and that’s my fault there. That solution really is somewhat worrying

also to be real Meta/facebook/mark corpseberg/etc has always been really sketchy especially with their privacy policy.

One thing I always thought was that the US atleast had SOME form of law/regulation/etc similar to gdpr but i guess bad assumption on my end

Totally fine! I hope I didn't come off as condescending as that wasn't my intention! Governments intentionally try and spin bills in their favour a lot, in the case of this one lawmakers Are trying to say it's just a method to force ByteDance to sell TikTok when it's clearly more than that in the long run, even if it's unintentional. Also in regards to data privacy laws some states do have GDPR-style laws but there doesn't seem to be anything nationwide from my research (I don't live in the US so it's not my expert subject but I am mostly aware the US is more lax than other nations).