Womp womps. The pinnacle of human achievement, the apex of modern culture. It stands alone in its excellence, unparalleled in its majesty. The womp womp is a symbol of pure genius, a testament to the ingenuity and sheer brilliance of the human mind.
Womp womp.
The DSM 5.
Its the handbook that psychologists use to diagnose people. Look through it. Do you see "addiction" as a diagnosis? No, its not a mental disorder, however it can cause symptoms of anxiety and depression, which are, themselves, disorders.
Not to mention you have not provided me with any sources for your claim regarding skibidi toilets "effect on children" and as such are losing this entire argument.
Handbooks aren’t exactly exact by a few weeks
My source is a bunch of news websites and Wikipedia. Here’s the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skibidi_Toilet#Critical_reception
First of all, that is not even close to enough evidence to back up your claim of skibidi toilet causing mental disorders in children. Most of those excerpts are just saying its stupid and bad, with no mention at all about disorders being caused by it.
Also wikipedia? Youre really using wikipedia to back up your claim? Also what do you mean by "handbooks arent exact by a few weeks"? Thats literally a mental disorder checklist handbook, its as exact as can be.
Not evidence? How is Wikipedia not evidence? Does Wikipedia only tell lies?
It is stupid and bad though
Yes, Wikipedia. Someone also backed up my claim on the Scratch Forums (if you know what that is)
By that I meant that Skibidi Toilet Syndrome is a recent discovery which would explain why handbook wouldn’t contain it, also I don't have that book.
Bro its wikipedia. Its a website anyone can access and edit as they please. Anyone with an account can edit wikipedia, thats why no teacher will actually accept wikipedia as a source.
Also no such thing as skibidi toilet syndrome exists, literally the title itself makes no sense.
Give me some actual credible sources, from professional psychologists or therapists. Otherwise you really are just talking bullshit.
Wikipedia is actually more reliable than a lot of sources because well it has sources. That might be self contradictory in theory, but it practice it works.
There's no official name for it as it's not widely well known of.
Firstly, stop being so rude, and secondly, I just said why Wikipedia is a valuable source.