Pariki: “I'm going to look past the null-echo fact and settle this debate with a simple axiom. There is no such thing as a physical form of malice, which is merely a psychological construct. Evil is not born; it is taught.”

Pariki: “When they were created, they weren't born with the concept or intent of evil. They were taught that the Priestess was their enemy. They were a naive mind, imprinting on anything they were told without question. If they had been raised in a different barn, none of this would have been an issue. They had no choice but to believe what they were told, and none of that was their choice. I run this by you once more: Volvagia is innocent.

Icelandic Waters: “. . . Fallacies, discrepancies and world logic aside, I find it laughable that you're trying to prove the innocence of a digital entity controlled by hardcoded programming! We all know that you're just grieving over a precious dragon. If you want Volvagia to be your friend, just hit up those ROM leaks and bust out your nonexistent C++ skills!”

Icelandic Water Dragon: “Besides, even if they don't know better, could it be justified that the Priestess was acting in self-defense?” *checks the flowchart* “…she's only at fault for ‘undue‘ harm. That doesn't help the argument at all.”

comments