Hot Take: I don’t think Blaze is a waste of clone. Blaze has many other features that waste of doesn’t have (as pointed out by blaze) such as videos, groups, and DM’s. While I don’t think blaze has done a ton for this site, mainly just advertise blaze, I would not ban them personally. However, this is up to the people who own the site. Also, if you unfollow blaze, it’s unlikely you will see their post’s, since blaze has had like one post on trending throughout their “career”. Blaze is more similar to twitter than to wasteof in my opinion, so if you call it a wasteof clone, isn’t wasteof just a twitter clone? (Don’t get me wrong I love wasteof, but most people here call it “twitter but better) I wonder why they would say that???

TWITTER:

BLAZE:

TLDR:

I think blaze is more similar to twitter than wasteof. And In response to jeffalos’s post, I think he should do what he likes with his website.

If you don’t like blaze, unfollow them, and you shouldn’t see there posts often