OK so. What’s wrong with the page I made? Because I can see lots of things to fix in the one you made (external links in body, punctuation after references, date formats, etc., not to mention it said wasteof is “Swedish”, which I corrected). I can fix yours, I can spend a few hours improving it to the quality of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Not-cheesewhisk3rs/wasteof.money (which is probably start-class, but at least it abides by a lot of the MoS). However, I don’t see why I should do this when - and this is in no way your fault - there are no reliable, secondary, independent sources for either draft.

I don’t know what’s wrong with the draft I made specifically, but I know that both were built WP:BACKWARDS. And I can tell you how to improve your draft, but it won’t be accepted, and neither will mine. Sorry if this comes off as rude, but both drafts will hit the same roadblock: notability.