There's a lot of mystery involved. The more recent arcs have been heavy on plot twists and dramatising although that has been present since the beginning. There's little to no focus on individual characters as they all serve StarClan's machinations of "amusement" called prophecies which torture the living cats, and depress young medicine cats like frostpaw and shadowsight and jayfeather and... too heavy on depressed med cats. those kitties don't deserve it . also there's really no character focus in the main arcs (novellas, super editions, etc. don't count because those are character focus). it's almost like the erins use warrior cats to ... subtly create a mashup of (murder) mystery, country simulation, fantasy and practically factual storytelling. there's really nothing else like it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Investigative_journalism&diff=1321987782&oldid=1321493876 I meant it to say “shorten” not summary
Hey. You made the old Wasteof Wikipedia page, right? If you're willing, I'd like you to contribute to this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Wasteof.money_(Social_Media)
Yours was very short, informal (as in, not formal), and was “wildly inaccurate” according to Jeffalo. I made this one because yours was automatically deleted because it was a draft that hadn't been edited in six months and declined, coincidentally so just a few days after I made mine. Help me prove to this site that this platform is worthy of an article.
Incorrect. The one I wrote is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Not-cheesewhisk3rs/wasteof.money
I let the other one get deleted precisely because it was so bad. Yours will also be deleted after 6 months. The reason why mine is in a user: namespace is so that it isn’t deleted after 6 months… I hope
Sure, I can, it’s just that you’ll meet the same problem as I did, finding source. Unfortunately, we can’t do anything about the fact that there are no in depth sources about wasteof.
OK so. What’s wrong with the page I made? Because I can see lots of things to fix in the one you made (external links in body, punctuation after references, date formats, etc., not to mention it said wasteof is “Swedish”, which I corrected). I can fix yours, I can spend a few hours improving it to the quality of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Not-cheesewhisk3rs/wasteof.money (which is probably start-class, but at least it abides by a lot of the MoS). However, I don’t see why I should do this when - and this is in no way your fault - there are no reliable, secondary, independent sources for either draft.
I don’t know what’s wrong with the draft I made specifically, but I know that both were built WP:BACKWARDS. And I can tell you how to improve your draft, but it won’t be accepted, and neither will mine. Sorry if this comes off as rude, but both drafts will hit the same roadblock: notability.
Also, where did jeffalo say my page was informal and “wildly inaccurate"? Considering this is the only discussion I've had with him on the page:
https://alpha.wasteof.money/users/jeffalo/wall/6817a13aafe7f204f63b8a9a
In Discord DMs. I don't even know what the thing on your user page is, I'm talking about Draft:Wasteof.money, which no longer exists.
“I’d wish .. to complete everything. Nothing left to do. Everything that can be done, done.”
The genie waited then replied: “Now what will you do?”
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wellesley_College&diff=1315465405&oldid=1313321382 7000th edit