Let’s play a game of “Fortunately, Unfortunately“. Respond the previous post (the first comment below this post) by replying this post (not the previous post!)
I’ll start with: “I found this website.“
why is it so mesmerizing seeing a turing machine doing its thing
Since linear scoring is bad, how about a logarithmic one:
10 dB: This is the best of the best. Nothing can beat this.
8 dB: This is very good!
6 dB: That’s nice.
5 dB: Eh, it’s fine.
4 dB: It’s a bit lacking.
3 dB: You need to do better than this.
0 dB: Bleh.
-Infinity dB: This is the worst thing I’ve ever seen in my life.
How people perceive scores:
10/10: This is the best of the best. Nothing can beat this.
9/10: This is very good!
8/10: Hey, that's nice!
7/10: Uh, it's fine.
6/10: You need to do better than this.
5/10: You need to do better than this.
4/10: Bleh.
3/10: Bleh.
2/10: Bleh.
1/10: Bleh.
0/10: Bleh.
This shows us that linear scoring is bad.
3000000 BC: The universe is created.
2999999 BC: Eugene Krabs is born.
2999998 BC: The country of Japan is created.
Do you think we will had something like wasteof but for videos?
public class Haiku {
int verboseVariable;
} // this is just fillertbh i think oop languages exists just to make codes tidier
so you won't end up writing codes that looks like this:
struct what {
// yada yada yada
}
void whatever(what *yes){
// do something with yes
}