AURIALI HAS WON THE ELECTION
LEADERBOARD
Auriali - 27
Kiwi - 10
Toaks - 2
Eris - 9
Late - 1
Jeffalo - 2
Skylar - 1
Gambercube6 - 1
Allyz - 3
$upercash - 1
Mybearworld - 1
Elaruu - 3
-1 - 1
steve0greatness
29204958174050385058385058278r - 2
29204958174050385058385058278q - 1
“Miku” - 1
People who have voted: Esben, Wynd, Dertermenter, Kiwi, Toaks, cheesewhisk3rs, Perrin, Donotforgetmycode, Slider_on_the_black, Jamied132, luckythecat, prehistoric-pancake, Blaze, Gryffin, JoshAtticus (rip atticus, the best cat fr), wlodekm2, tnix, radi8, late, busybird15, RedStrider, siliconecb_, geo, elsie, ethernet, 94, paradocktheman, buttah, aurali, zlf, k10398, mybearworld, birdfour, gamecuber6, supercash, touchcreator, catblock, ally, flex, wolf, strawberrypuding, arrow, zagle1772, supernoodles99, impossible usernames, mef, zid, salad, pkmnq, oren, yippymishy, yay, magma, mrmeems, seether, twyx, mrowlsss, ajskateboarder, nezon, blax_, wahsp, lily, vubobinali, -1, faeyie, steve0greatness, silly
Voter count: 68
comments (single view)
I vote for whoever in the next 24 hours gives the biggest computable natural number in a reply to this comment.
I’ll just name it right now so we can get to the fun part quickly: TREE(3)
It’s Graham’s number. It is so large that even the power representation (like 3↑↑↑↑3) only scratches the surface of its actual size. It far exceeds typical large numbers used in math, science, and technology.
(whatever number everyone else says in the replies to your comment, clamped to at least 1, and then multiplied all together)
The successor of the number @jamied132 replied with. Their reply no longer counts, as it is now no longer well-defined.
Basically your number + 1, so mine has to be bigger than yours but yours also has to be bigger than mine, which is not something that can happen, so neither of these replies count
Unfortunately the natural numbers don’t think so and I can only vote for one person anyway