UNBAN LILY!
This is the start of my protest! I will be boycotting wasteof.money until she is unbanned! (I frankly think the term “Boycotting” is sexist as it implies that girls cannot do the same.)
Lily has done nothing except express her opinion, and the banning of her extorts our right to free speech! We will not stop until justice is recieved and Lily is returned to the platform immedieately!
#FREELILY!
comments
I wholeheartedly agree. The term “Boycotting” is actually super racist as well, as people who can’t speak English have a hard time reading and pronouncing it.
Thank you! This is why our society has gone to shame! Sexism and racism run rampant in the wild! Only those pure of heart can save us!
#FREELILY! #FREESPEECH!
I also think it’s absolutely sexist and racist that lily’s verification badge was taken away after this controversy
Thank you for supporting the movement! If you’d like to spread the gospel, please copy and paste the original post and post it so we can send a message to wasteof.money management! We will not be silenced! We will not be stopped!
#FREELILY! #FREESPEECH!
Whether temporary or not, she deserves to be unbanned! She never should’ve been banned in the first place for just speaking her opinion! This is a violation of our rights partitioned by our forefathers!
#FREELILY! #FREESPEECH!
Is this satire? Also, the “boy” in “boycott” is just the surname of Captain Charles C. Boycott, the man after whom the word was coined
This is not a joke! This is not sarcasm! This is not satire! This is a violation of our natural rights, that were given to us by our forefathers and that should be enforced by the great United States of America!
And what gender is Captain Charles C. Boycott? Exactly!
#FREELILY! #FREESPEECH!
given to us by our forefathers
There are more countries than the UK and the USA
Forefathers refers to ancestors! Please stop being disrespectful! I never said anything about that and you’re twisting my words!
#FREELILY! #FREESPEECH!
Wait for the mods to say what the reason was, maybe deserved, maybe not. Also, it could just be a temporary ban
sorry i misread your comment lmao. anyway i think it’s most likely a temp ban but apparently she’s got temp bans before so could be on a tight rope
Whether temporary or not, she deserves to be unbanned! She never should’ve been banned in the first place for just speaking her opinion!