@socialism: Advocates for no incentive to work since we are all going to be paid the same anyways, less entrepreneurial opportunities and innovation, advocating for price controls, leading to a reduction in supply and more starvation, and believes in collective ownership of property, and not allowing their citizens to own a piece of property.
@capitalism: Advocates for incentive to work as more people are going to be paid for hard work, more entrepreneurial opportunities and innovation (which leads to better progress and more creativity), advocating for supply and demand, where the price goes up and down based on the demand and supply that is available and believes in individuals owning their OWN property, without anyone else taking that away from them.
The choice is obvious. Will we choose freedom or socialism? Follow us for more.
comments
u could see the fast progress we have made in our primarily capitalist society as a negative, because it has lead to many oversights, the climate for example (e.g. we invested lots of money into cars and infrastructure for cars, and they’re are now an integral part of modern life, but they are also a huge problem for the climate)
not allowing their citizens to own a piece of property
this is the point i was focusing on, which is true under communism but not under most interpretations of socialism
tell me you don't know what socialism is without telling me you don't know what socialism is
Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
This does not debunk my argument, at all.