@gilbert189

use rand::Rng; // import rand
use std::cmp::Ordering; // import ordering
use std::io; // import io
// nothing here
fn main() { // start `main` function
	println! // print the text
		("Guess the number!"); // about what this program does
// nothing here
	let secret_number = // get secret number
		rand // on module rand
		::thread_rng() // get this thread's RNG
		.gen_range(1..=100); // generate number between 1 and 100
// nothing here
	loop { // i feel loopy
		println! // print the text
			("Please input your guess."); // to ask for guess
// nothing here
		let mut guess = // define mutable variable `guess`
			String  // of type String
			::new(); // a blank value
// why are there so many blank lines
		io::stdin() // get standard input
            .read_line // read a line there
				(&mut guess) // borrow guess to write it there
            .expect // when it failed
				("Failed to read line"); // panic with this text
// i'm lonely
		let guess: u32 = // define a variable `guess`
			match // we will be matching
				guess // the guess
				.trim() // without the spaces
				.parse() // parsed into a u32
			{ // MATCHING START!
				Ok(num) // if ok
					=> // then
					num, // return that num
				Err(_) // if error
					=> // then
					continue, // ignore
			}; // MATCHING STOP?
// i'm all alone
		match // we will be matching
			guess // the guess
			.cmp // compared with
				(&secret_number) // the secret number
		{ // MATCHING START!
			Ordering // if
				::Less // it's less
					=> // then
				println! // print the text
					("Too small!"), // about it being less
			Ordering // if
				::Greater // it's greater
					=> // then
				println! // print the text
					("Too big!"), // about it being greater
			Ordering // if
				::Equal // it's equal
					=> // then
				{ // do this
					println! // print the text
						("Too small!"); // about winning
					break; // end program
				} // doing done
		}; // MATCHING STOP?
	} // my loopy wore off
} // end `main` function

someone made a code that’s commented in every line so I made it worse

What I wanted to do:

ASUS@JOHN /m/d/Music> ffplay -f lavfi "amovie='02.\ Overworld.mp3'[in];[in]showcqt[out:v];[in]aresample=44100[out:a]"
ffplay version 2024-07-15-git-350146a1ea-full_build-www.gyan.dev Copyright (c) 2003-2024 the FFmpeg developers
  built with gcc 13.2.0 (Rev5, Built by MSYS2 project)
  configuration: (pruned)
  libavutil      59. 28.100 / 59. 28.100
  libavcodec     61. 10.100 / 61. 10.100
  libavformat    61.  5.101 / 61.  5.101
  libavdevice    61.  2.100 / 61.  2.100
  libavfilter    10.  2.102 / 10.  2.102
  libswscale      8.  2.100 /  8.  2.100
  libswresample   5.  2.100 /  5.  2.100
  libpostproc    58.  2.100 / 58.  2.100
[mp3 @ 00000154d71761c0] Estimating duration from bitrate, this may be inaccurate
[lavfi @ 00000154d7153340] Open inputs in the filtergraph are not acceptable
amovie='02.\ Overworld.mp3'[in];[in]showcqt[out:v];[in]aresample=44100[out:a]: Invalid argument

What I actually had to do:

ASUS@JOHN /m/d/Music> ffmpeg -v -8 -i 02.\ Overworld.mp3 -filter_complex "[0:a]showcqt[out]" -map "[out]" -map 0:a -c:v rawvideo -c:a pcm_f64le -f nut pipe: | ffplay -i pipe:
ffplay version 2024-07-15-git-350146a1ea-full_build-www.gyan.dev Copyright (c) 2003-2024 the FFmpeg developers
  built with gcc 13.2.0 (Rev5, Built by MSYS2 project)
  configuration: (pruned)
  libavutil      59. 28.100 / 59. 28.100
  libavcodec     61. 10.100 / 61. 10.100
  libavformat    61.  5.101 / 61.  5.101
  libavdevice    61.  2.100 / 61.  2.100
  libavfilter    10.  2.102 / 10.  2.102
  libswscale      8.  2.100 /  8.  2.100
  libswresample   5.  2.100 /  5.  2.100
  libpostproc    58.  2.100 / 58.  2.100
Input #0, nut, from 'pipe:':aq=    0KB vq=    0KB sq=    0B
  Metadata:
    TBPM            : 105
    encoded_by      : LAME in FL Studio 20
    date            : 2023
    encoder         : Lavf61.5.101
  Duration: N/A, start: 0.000000, bitrate: N/A
  Stream #0:0: Video: rawvideo (I420 / 0x30323449), yuv420p, 1920x1080, SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9, 25 tbr, 51200 tbn
      Metadata:
        encoder         : Lavc61.10.100 rawvideo
  Stream #0:1: Audio: pcm_f64le (PFD[64] / 0x40444650), 44100 Hz, 2 channels, dbl, 5644 kb/s
      Metadata:
        encoder         : Lavc61.10.100 pcm_f64le
  23.08 A-V: -0.016 fd=   6 aq=   18KB vq=18225KB sq=    0B

thanks ffmpeg

I’ve just realized that the Bounce Tales music is in the Roland GS soundfont (the default one for Windows for playing MIDI files)

Makes me wonder if somebody had remade it into a MIDI file exactly

I have so many projects that I “left” as in “okay I think this is done, let’s move on to another project”. As such, there’s usually a big gap between me working on the same project to the last time I worked on it before.

In the priority queue I had:

• an esolang called Iternary which is about iterators

• tbgclient-rewritten, an automation framework for the TBGs

• Bit, a GRU chatbot for Scratch

• urea geller but in the Famicom + FDS (turns out the MOD has reverb/overlapping sustain and mordents on it which I can’t implement correctly on FamiTracker due to skill issue)

Here’s my other projects that has a particularly high “revisiting” feeling:

• Gravy, an esolang about currying in the wrong way

• SquareOne, a Scratch reimplementation

• New Clash, a second attempt to make an OS in Scratch

• Flipbit, a simple ADPCM codec that got more complex over time (I think I’d say this is done)

• ElementalOnThings, a general engine of the Elemental game from Cary

• Elcedees, a font inspired by the 16×2 LCD screen usually used by μC hobbyists

• Babalang+, an extension of Babalang

• @imgru (Remember them? Currently I can’t find a place to host them, and till this day Oracle Cloud still rejected my debit card, and I don’t feel like hosting it on the poor Jeff)

• A JSaB engine on Scratch

Here’s some projects ideas I had:

• Systema Vectorum (needs correct Latin), a font inspired from the System font/the charset of the VGA graphics card with the style of Elcedees

• ScratchStyle2 and Ocular style for SMF

• A Mastodon streaming server on Jeff with the web frontend hosted somewhere else (probably CS)

• and probably others…

I Wanna Lockpick on Playdate

[2024-08-11 01:08:08,550] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) VLC and OBS are so easy to mix up
[2024-08-11 01:09:39,649] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) playdate
[2024-08-11 01:09:54,683] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) IWL for the playdate
[2024-08-11 01:09:58,594] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) that would be awesome
[2024-08-11 01:10:27,258] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) mind-numbing lockwork whenever you need it
[2024-08-11 01:11:16,576] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) hmm
[2024-08-11 01:11:33,213] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) *opens FMN censoring index*
[2024-08-11 01:11:59,770] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) arcade.makecode.com
[2024-08-11 01:12:01,675] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) nout it
[2024-08-11 01:12:24,027] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) it's still up
[2024-08-11 01:12:43,972] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) and they're actively updating it...
[2024-08-11 01:14:08,463] <IcelandicWater> (PRIVMSG) kbai

Yeah, good luck differentiating keys and doors with a 1-bit screen

where is the unsee juice

I need it

notating scambaiting attempts as if it was chess

I thought an ulcer in my alveolar was peak

Turns out an ulcer in the tongue is worse

So I thought of using DaVinci Resolve as my main video editor since I’ve heard good things about it

what is this RAM usage I can’t even

I’ve just realized that the version of Windows 11 on my new laptop John (Windows 11 Home 21H2) is already at EOS 10 months ago

whoops

Mass Indifferency: Is Converting A Bad Idea?

(an excerpt of “Me and The Internet”, on the section “Politics: Both Prevalent and Taboo”)

There's a more neutral approach of handling conflicting opinions; neutral enough that it's used by almost everyone, with them either knowing it or not. What's that approach? Be indifferent. Saying anything would only cause more harm than good, so don't say a word on it. Making others convert their beliefs (for the lack of a better term) isn't worth your effort, and so does fighting to defend yours.

As I see it, there are two types of indifferency:

• Aggressive indifferency, that is complete denial of opinion. You do not care if their opinions are right or wrong. They would only steer their beliefs into yours, for better or worse; that is not okay.

  This is the most coercive way of “thinking" about other's opinions, and also the most common one that people use on the Internet, it seems like; popularized with the terms “no u" and the earlier “ur mom gay" (which fell out of favor for obvious reasons). I wrote thinking in quotes there because it's not even thinking, instead you just put their statements in the bin to be shredded later.

  Aggressive indifferency preserves their own beliefs well, however it can be perceived as, well, aggressive. They felt ignored. All the things they perceive as right for them is nullified or even rejected by this one individual/group. This is what drives people to fight for their beliefs.

• Permissive indifferency, which involves consideration of one's opinion, eventual or immediate. You acknowledge the possibility of coming up with that opinion, but you don't want to put or exert your position about it.

  Unlike aggressive indifferency, this school of thought is more lax in terms of thinking about opinions, and also the approach I've used when encountering statements that opposes my beliefs. Other than that, permissive indifferency is mostly used on statements they knew they couldn't do much with, such as worldwide conflicts or something similar.

  Permissive indifferency is a much more forgiving indifferency, however it could make people naïve at perceiving opinions. They're easy to lose grip on their beliefs. All it takes is the thought “hmm, maybe they're not wrong" for their stance to start shifting away. When untreated, this would turn into heresy.

One being indifferent of a certain topic of discussion―one way or the other―gives little reason for the other to exert their opinions on them. I mean, if they don't react even a little bit to what's being said, why bother? So, if the way people handle opposing opinions is by indifferency, is it bad to convert someone? Are any attempts to preach or persuade someone to follow your stances merely an exercise in futility? And if you somehow did, should you feel guilty?

Unfortunately, we as social beings can't cope well with indifferency, one way or another. We are made to interact with each other, be it to help or to hurt. Both are valid ways to exert their opinion. Sure, hurting others is discouraged, but that's not gonna stop people from doing it. World War II is one extreme example.

And it's not just limited to hurting either. Helping someone is also a form of giving attention, both for the helper, the one being helped, and others who witness them. Sympathy and empathy are also one reason why people stand their reasoning on a topic. These actions―conflicts, major or minor; assistance, sympathy, and empathy―are not entirely physical. Verbal abuse like threats, gaslighting, and bullying is a thing, and so does verbal support like appreciation and recognition. All of those are ways to show their way of reasoning.

But okay. Let's suppose that indifferency is the common mindset of the people. People wouldn't exert their opinions because it's not worth their time; they would just ignore what they say. What would that society look like? Here's my take on it:

Everyone would quickly turn asocial. The number of interactions between people would significantly reduce to none, mainly because any form of attention is considered lewd to these people in concept. Even suggestions would be considered taboo. As such, freedom of speech becomes unnecessary. Freedom of will takes over it.

Morality would also be phased out. No one cares what the others are thinking. It's not their business. Instead, they replace it with their ego. And a really grayscale one as well. No one wants or even tolerates boasts here. Because of this, life of the people would be very inert.

Eventually, social integrations, from families to nations, would cease to exist. In this society, if we can call it that, people only care for themselves. Isolation is absolute. Those that couldn't take care of themselves cannot survive on this imaginary world; others wouldn't care if they need help.

It's kinda grim, isn't it? Now I would like to see a novelist illustrating such world. Or at least their interpretation of it.

Just seen someone on YouTube supporting abstension…

…oh wait, you’re telling me this is not how to use social media?

Privacy. That’s iPhone.

—local iPhone advertisement (translated)

Wiktionary has [[Appendix:I don’t speak]] but not [[Appendix:Do you speak]]