Since I make art and stuff... If you want my art, go follow me on bluesky. It's way friendlier to images and videos, and has a larger community
https://bsky.app/profile/sirtoaks.bsky.social
If you want to support me, find my Ko-fi at
One day with FL studio. I have cooked something immaculate. It's actually starting to sound good. Why did I avoid this for so long
FL studio is $50 off. If you want a version beyond basic edition, buy basic with the same and then upgrade and you still save $50
FL studio is $50 off. If you want a version beyond basic edition, buy basic with the same and then upgrade and you still save $50
Why did my level suggestion reach the national news
Welcome to the first official post from the Thrat-Eris campaign!
As newly-sworn (by newly I mean two months ago) president of the greatest site to waste money on, I would like to formerly announce some new laws that will be going into effect, effective immediately.
NEGATIVE tax rate on ALL breakfast items except for French Toast because it SUCKS! The government will now be paying you from our annual breakfast budget of $20 annually for every breakfast item you eat! If we run out of money, we will just be printing more money!
Why has no other president thought ofthat oneyet?Edit: uhh nvm ab printing money..@thrat MUST return to his prime of April 2026, as in when wasteof was down.
We have successfully taken down the DANGEROUS TERRORIST website of blazeapp.net, and will be charging @kyletech of Larceny because he stole my heart by making Blaze coded by Lovable AI. The court website will instead be programmed by a ChatGPT model from 2023.
@thrat will be playing The Flawless as suggested by @toaks by 2027. Contrary to the level’s name, this level has many many flaws.
@eris will NOW be required to use Windows 8.1 instead of Windows 11, because Windows 8.1 was a far superior operating system.
@specialred_ will now be required to pay reparations for all affected by their shitting at the Incline Bench. How do you shit yourself when you only have five pounds on each side?
That’s all for now, but make sure to give us a follow to keep up with us!
-thratwitch
Why am I on so many lists. Am I John "Waster" Money or something
NEW OBJECTIVE BASED PEOPLE LIST JUST DROPPED
I smell at least 3 GOATed users on this list
“I wish there was an unbiased and objective list of the 5 coolest wasteof users”
Wasteof index:
The animation I made for my first freelance work has been released, and we're in the running to win $1000!
Check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLm41P0X-ak
The animation for my first job is almost entirely done. Expect to see the results soon!
Unrelated but I have received my very first animation freelance work :0
I feel the need to say, especially in relation to my previous repost of this - the judge's ruling here is correct. Whether it's good or not that clean drinking water isn't a protected right in Mississippi is a completely different issue. But you know what is?
I take issue with how this article is written. There are some simple facts here: lead poisoning, city didn't fix, sued over constitutional infringement, and that didn't work. Why bring up "trump-appointed judge" or the demographics of the population of Jackson? The judge's job was to consider whether this infringed on constitutionally protected rights, and they did their job. Should the city face charges for gross negligence? Probably! But not for constitutional stuff.
It's really, really easy to begin to spin things as "us versus them!!!!", which is what this article is doing. It's implying that them, being the Trump administration and co, are trying to make lead in the water okay (or something along those lines). That's not what happened. There are layers to this, and things we're not told. WHY did the city remain silent about the lead? Was the judge supposed to consider more than just constitutionality? After all, they're not saying lead in the water is okay, they're just reconfirming that the US constitution does not give you an inherent right to clean water.
(UN human rights don't apply to the USA I guess, because this is a UN human right)
Anywho it's 3 am goodnight
Just to play devil’s advocate for a brief moment, I mean, yeah, there is no constitutional right to clean water in the US. Source: I have a constitution in front of me right now. There is an argument to be made with the 9th amendment that you have rights beyond those stated in the Constitution, and that would reasonably include clean water. But, yknow, it’s up in the air and I’m not a constitutional expert
The part which is unforgivable is “Engelhardt stated there is no ‘constitutional right to truthful information from officials during a public health crisis.’ “
Like. Yeah. No shit. That’s not a constitutional right. But ???????????? The Constitution opens with one of its purposes being to promote the general welfare, and this sounds very much like officials are taking steps to intentionally ensure that the general welfare of Jackson, Mississippi is not being promoted.
Just because you didn’t infringe on constitutional rights doesn’t mean your lies suddenly didn’t cause people lead poisoning. Pure malarkey
You Don't Have a Right to Safe Drinking Water, US Court Rules
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/09/drinking-water-mississippi-lawsuit/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49584637
