The famous post “I shat myself in my maths exam” has been deleted
Heartbreaking. Gone but not forgotten - its memory lives on
Hey guys, would anyone who hasn’t already be interested in doing the trolley problem for a survey?
I want my results to be as representative of wasteofers as possible. it's a fun little experiment that takes a dive into what wasteofers think, just like @imadeanaccount ‘s political compass survey.
So it would be lovely if anyone could participate 
based
Hot take: people should not celebrate or endorse obesity. Making something that is very unhealthy seem okay isn't right, especially something like weight.
Edit: I wholeheartedly do not mean to insult or make anyone feel bad. I support anyone who is fat, being fat does not make you a bad person or anything, but it's extremely important to understand that weight issues can be big health problems and it's important to care about weight.
Again, I mean no harm to anyone. If you are feeling depressed or negative, please reach out. There are people who will support you.
showerthoughtsbot when told to not post something serverly deluded:
This is so cool! I think it really accurately shows wasteof’s audience in an interesting way.
Mine’s very accurate, more of a true neutral near to the centre, but always in the bottom left still (wonder if anyone though I was right)
I’ve done my test 10 times to see if it always the same - I’m always in the same place in left, but my authoritarian placing can move up by 0.25-1. Depends what mood I’m in lmao
back up to 50, thanks guys!
Thanks lads for 50 followers! Been a rocky ride the last few days but I really appreciate this site and all the awesome people on it!
Got the whole squad laughing Owen!!!!
knock knock.
who's there?
cow.
cow wh-
moooooo! haha, get it? it's a cow joke because cows go moooo! haha...
...please laugh 
Exactly right! And as pointed out, one of his chocolate bars is called “deez nuts” - this is grossly inappropriate, probably disrupting classrooms of kids saying about their nuts/making inappropriate jokes/chucking actual nuts at others and causing concussions and is probably a nightmare for teachers to deal with as mrbeast has brainwashed the younger generation!
You forgot that he encourages obesity by selling his awful burgers and his chocolate bars, where he doesn’t use fairtrade and pay any of the workers who collect the chocolate since he pockets it all to pollute and destroy resources!
I’ve banned my kids from watching mrbeast from this.
Hot take: Mrbeast is the worst YouTuber of all time. He does poverty tourism for money to buy himself 50 lambos to shred, its unnaceptable.
he’s doing many other terrible things as shown in this video, it’s a must watch: https://youtu.be/JNmM4P9gKAQ?si=w0tNhaKWEEf2BcJ5
Hot take: Mrbeast is the worst YouTuber of all time. He does poverty tourism for money to buy himself 50 lambos to shred, its unnaceptable.
he’s doing many other terrible things as shown in this video, it’s a must watch: https://youtu.be/JNmM4P9gKAQ?si=w0tNhaKWEEf2BcJ5
I always have good intentions, but don’t always convey them in the best way. I will improve this in the future.
Some people have been telling me that his first quote is unrelated to the second quote, but I believe it is, since in both of them he said it “was the only way he could think of to defend vast armies of bots”
"The single most important reason that we are moving to having a small monthly payment for the use of the X system, is it is the only way I could think of to combat vast armies of bots,"
… so pioritising posts written by by X premium subscribers, we’re actually gonna come out with a lower tier pricing so y’know, we’re wanting it to just be a small amount of money, that this is the (stumbles) it’s a longer discussion but in my view this is the only defense against vast armies of bots.
He says in both statements they are the only defense he could think of to combat bots, so if the statements were different, he would know 2 proposed defenses to combat bots, not 1. This is why I think that the 2 statements are interlinked with eachother and he was talking about a lower priced, premimum subscription all along, and that he was originally unclear.
Lads, I dislike Elon just as much as the next wasteof user, but this isn’t true.
People are just misinterpreting his comment. He just said that there may be a new tier of Twitter preminum that costs less.
Source: https://twitter.com/netanyahu/status/1703806204894498966 (this is the literal interview he did which people are saying he said this) Yes, the first quote on 34:40 seems to support @imadeanaccount’s claim, but if you go on (at about 35:30) he then seems to clarify he’s referring to a new, lower priced subscription.
Here is the quote:
… so pioritising posts written by by X premium subscribers, we’re actually gonna come out with a lower tier pricing so y’know, we’re wanting it to just be a small amount of money, that this is the (stumbles) it’s a longer discussion but in my view this is the only defense against vast armies of bots.
The reasoning that this proposed new lower tier of premium may happen is to combat bots, which was also mentioned in the original quote that people are alarmed over (people saying this quote is saying about putting twitter behind a paywall)
"The single most important reason that we are moving to having a small monthly payment for the use of the X system, is it is the only way I could think of to combat vast armies of bots,"
The reasonings correlating on both the quotes makes me believe he was originally talking about a lower, cheaper tier all along, and that he was just unclear.
Lads, I dislike Elon just as much as the next wasteof user, but this isn’t true.
People are just misinterpreting his comment. He just said that there may be a new tier of Twitter preminum that costs less.
Source: https://twitter.com/netanyahu/status/1703806204894498966 (this is the literal interview he did which people are saying he said this) Yes, the first quote on 34:40 seems to support @imadeanaccount’s claim, but if you go on (at about 35:30) he then seems to clarify he’s referring to a new, lower priced subscription.
Here is the quote:
… so pioritising posts written by by X premium subscribers, we’re actually gonna come out with a lower tier pricing so y’know, we’re wanting it to just be a small amount of money, that this is the (stumbles) it’s a longer discussion but in my view this is the only defense against vast armies of bots.
The reasoning that this proposed new lower tier of premium may happen is to combat bots, which was also mentioned in the original quote that people are alarmed over (people saying this quote is saying about putting twitter behind a paywall)
"The single most important reason that we are moving to having a small monthly payment for the use of the X system, is it is the only way I could think of to combat vast armies of bots,"
The reasonings correlating on both the quotes makes me believe he was originally talking about a lower, cheaper tier all along, and that he was just unclear.
Hot take: Adverts that advocate for obesity is fine in any way should be banned immediately.
There are no good causes from being obese.
sorry if i’ve annoyed/upset anybody online recently. I will be better in the future to be less problematic/argumentative